Just got a note back from the builder I know and he said (as we've found already) that thegasket/windage tray will work but he also said that the 5.8 part isn't particularly good as a windage tray on a 4.6 as it's designed to clear the longer stroke of the 5.4/5.8.
-Steve
OP why not just get an aftermarket K member at this point? :shrug: You've already do the hard part of the job with the motor lifting. You'll save weight, obtain the needed clearence, and there's options to keep your OE suspension if you don't want to get into coilovers etc.
OP why not just get an aftermarket K member at this point? :shrug: You've already do the hard part of the job with the motor lifting. You'll save weight, obtain the needed clearence, and there's options to keep your OE suspension if you don't want to get into coilovers etc.
Great Point ..
The clearance between the 5.8 crank and the 4.6 will be significantly different
Russ that sounds like a good plan. I don't have the resources readily aviable but I'm sure I could figure out something. I was going to cut up the k member this weekend and just find someone local to weld it up to once the clearance was achieved. I only have a couple weeks at home before I leave for a month so my motor is not going anywhere fast. I was just trying to get as much work done that I could while on my holiday leave. If it is a better option I can send you my pan before I leave and I'm sure you can do something with it over a months time.
Just let me know.
I really appreciate it!
Troy
That sounds like a plan. Based on what I've seen I think beveling the pan will be less intrusive then notching the K-member but I won't know for sure until I see it for myself. If I determine the best direction to take is to clearance the pan I'll let you know what I plan to do and you can decide if want me to throw you pan into the mix and they will both get modified at the same time. I prefer to have your pan along with mine before I make the plug and trim the sump this weekend or early next week so I can do them in parallel. Should be able to get it to the TIG welders the following Weekend.
I'll PM you the shipping address.
The stock K-member will actually protect the engine and steering assembly better then most any aftermarket K-member and are pretty strong. In a lowered street car this is the only K-member I would run.
With that said, I've read that MM and Griggs K members are the only k member designed to meet those requirements. If I ever find a crazy package deal down the line I may try it out but I will be ready to swap back in my stock front suspension.
Chassis ski's are available for drag cars that will protect the bottom end much better than the stamped POS OE K-member any day if that's your only concern.
Do some more research I have a $400 range AJE that kept all the OE suspension.
I just don't want to go coil overs...
What's the reason for that? I was never interested in but recently its perked my interest as I'm hoping to dial in weight transfer and gain some traction. Not just track but even in general on the street.
From experience, coilover ride SUCKS. Many owners here have gone to them then gone back, a search will net said info. 1.51 60' here on IRS, QA1 rears, 70/30 fronts launching an eaton @ only 3k rpm. A 1.4 is in it without coilovers!
From experience, coilover ride SUCKS. Many owners here have gone to them then gone back, a search will net said info. 1.51 60' here on IRS, QA1 rears, 70/30 fronts launching an eaton @ only 3k rpm. A 1.4 is in it without coilovers!
OK didn't know that. I had chatted to another member here and he said coil overs where an impressive improvement over right quality. I guess I need to read up on it and get more info.
How did ride quality suck for you personally? to bouncy and soft? or it didn't corner like how you wanted?
I recently switched to MM coil overs and absolutely love the ride. I can't believe how much it improved. The car is flat out smoother.