exactly... the pre 99 Cobras weren't pushovers but they were dead heat runs for the LT1 cars with some losses some wins on each end. The 99+ 4vs stepped up the game... :beer:
lt1 vs 99cobra
- Thread starter mrbigjeep
- Start date
exactly... the pre 99 Cobras weren't pushovers but they were dead heat runs for the LT1 cars with some losses some wins on each end. The 99+ 4vs stepped up the game... :beer:
Actually, there is no 2 tenths between them. 1999-up 5-speed GTs are at no disadvantage in the 1/4 mile to a 6-speed LT1.
Its alot faster then Mustangs
.The 52MM TB is gone (making my car start hard), I sold it..
I bought mids for this Z28 but never put them on, ended up buying a snowmobile. I have added more mods, changed a couple things, added a stat, but still have the loudmouth, got new tips, etc.
Yo need to stop making yourself look so stupid before you go digging up info on me.
:lol1:
Those 2V's are Crazy fast!
A near stock 95 auto LT1 runnin a 13.8 is comparable to a 99-01 Cobra, which is pathetic.
From dig it would be a good run.
99-01 Cobra's aint shit.
Last edited:
Wow seriously, even after you saw the vid, you are still denying everything. Yes that was a rolling race im assuming from 2nd gear (which the LT1 got killed even with granny shifting :lol1: :lol::lol
, but you are telling me that the LT1 will put 3 car's on the Cobra on just the launch? An STI and Evo can't even do that even though they avg. at 1.8 60ft stock!!!!! My friends bone stock S2000 was getting the same damn trap speed (maybe faster) as your car :lol1: Seriously, do us all favor, not only for us, but for you too. STOP POSTING LIES, you are really making yourself look like an idiot. I really wonder how the LS1 guys treat you then again there has to be a reason why you always post over here. :lol::lol::lol:.EDIT:
Stopsign32v pretty much owned you :lol1::lol1::loser::lol::lol:
Last edited:
I'm an LS1 guy... :dancenana:
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2002
- Messages
- 9,444
Says the kid that lies about being modded so people will be more impressed when he beats a slower car. :lol1:
:loser:
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2002
- Messages
- 9,444
My 99 Cobra bone stock ran 13.5 and with bolt ons and 4.10s it ran 13.1@106mph. Sounds like you're alittle bit back Scooter. You might want to stick to the 2 valves so you don't get your feelings hurt. ;-)
Hahha You are comparing it to a 96 GT (215 HP, 285 TQ)??!!! To be honest, thats a pretty good as time for being an auto 96 GT. Now imagine an 99-04 GT?
Last edited:
There you have it... unfortunately for burnzilla there are many more examples of Cobras pulling off these times and very few LT1 examples. Trust me I've done the research, I know the numbers, I've searched high and low for numbers to compare the LT1 to the S197.. and even there it came up short. :rolling:
You say auto LT1's will murder auto 2V but in my experiance this is not true. I have 2 friends with Lt 1 cars, both auto, and 3 with 2V cars. One LT1 car went 9.0 1/8 mile time @ about 81mph and the other went 9.3 @ 79 mph. The 2 auto 2V GT's both went 9.2 @ 79mph and the 5 speed one went 8.9 @ 80mph. I would say the Lt 1 is on average the faster car than a 2V and can come somewhat close to a 4V car but is not on the same level at all.
Last edited:
nice kill my mach 1 has muffler delete and a o/r x pipe sounds sick
I would destroy my friends 96 Z28 auto from a dig to 100ish. He had cold air, air foil, high flow cat(s), and a magnaflow cat back. My mods BBK TB and Hurst Shifter. The same night at the track I was running 13.25@105 to his 13.8@101, and he had a 60' time that was a hair quicker.
LT1's in stock(ish) form have a very hard time breathing. Headers alone wake them up comparitively to when I sent my '99 back for it's "update". It takes my car with the following mods to hang with a bolt-on/geared new edge cobra; Edelbrock intake and runners, BBK big bore throttle body, MSD Ignition box, Borla Large Tube Headers,3” SLP Exhaust/no cats, GM Hotcam w/roller rockers, K&N air filter, lightweight flywheel, and pcm re-flash.......... The most substantial "seat of the pants" mods were the cam and headers. But even with the most aggressive cam in an LT1, I wouldn't see anything over 350-360 rwhp.
.
.
:lol: - Burn you dont' know when to shut up. What are you, like 17?......Stop owned your ass much like I have done over and over.
You're pathetic.
You're pathetic.
You are a joke for that comment right there. Aren't you a mustang guy? You should know that there is a big performance difference between 96-98 2V Gt's and 99-04 2V GT's. Don't insult LT1 owners by saying a mid 15 second car is "along the same lines of performance".
the 96-98 2v were indeed jokes (see low-mid15s) i owned a 97 GT is was ****ing pathetic
The 99-04s were decent for only 281 Cubes when they went low 14s...some dipped into the 13.90s
However, the 5.7L LT1 was a complete joke for displacing 5.7L in a muscle car and going low low 14s - high 13s...but then again it spanked the mustang GTs it was made to beat without problem at the time...then the LS1 came around we all knwo what happened then lol
From the other LS/LT vs stang threads we all know you're in denial but you DID see the video posted.....right? Go back and look @ post #9.
Last edited:
Stock '01 Cobras have gone low 13s, and that's on 245/45 ice skates.
If a '99-'01 Cobra ain't shit, the LT1 is a pipe dream.
Last edited:
Don't you love how he does that?.....13.8 is comparible to 13.4 (LT1 vs. 99-01 Cobra), but 13.8 isn't comparible to 14.2 (LT1 vs. 99-04 GT).
AAAAWE.....nut swinging at it's finest.:lol:
LT1's suck from a roll, I would know I used to have a 95 Z28 A4. A dig though is a different story they have great torque, especially with the 3:23's I had. I ran a best of 13.5 with full exhaust, K&N intake and a built tranny on 255 street tires.
Users who are viewing this thread
