San Antonio Theater Shooting

Brutal Metal

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
10,571
Location
Largo Florida
I think we can all agree that there are Amazing civilian AND Law Enforcement marksman as well as some that aren't so great!
 

SteveChris

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
1,137
Location
Houston, TX
Quit being an idiot, no one wants to force guns upon the people, people should be allowed to carry IF THEY PLEASE. Fact of the matter is, most school faculty that agrees to carry in a school is not only because they understand that the only thing that might have saved some lives in that tragedy would be a trained armed individual but also because they more than likely already have a gun and have practice. You're making it seem like you're ALLOWING teachers to carry yet they don't know what a trigger. People that are pro 2A is because they've been around guns and understand that we don't live in a utopia, most anti gun people are just knee jerk liberals who only come out of the woodwork when something like this happens, this is really easy to spot since 99% of them have little to know knowledge on guns.

i said that is what people are saying.. just hand guns to janitors and teachers.
i have been seeing people say it since the shooting.
i'm not assuming that's what they are saying...that IS what they're saying.
no matter how they get it, choosing or not, it's a dumb idea.

i can't believe anyone here wants more people to have guns.
too many on this site alone have arsenals and are crazy enough to actually believe they're going to be fighting our own government one day.
 

bglf83

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
1,719
Location
Texas
i said that is what people are saying.. just hand guns to janitors and teachers.
i have been seeing people say it since the shooting.
i'm not assuming that's what they are saying...that IS what they're saying.
no matter how they get it, choosing or not, it's a dumb idea.

i can't believe anyone here wants more people to have guns.
too many on this site alone have arsenals and are crazy enough to actually believe they're going to be fighting our own government one day.

We may have to one day, remember we did it before. That's how we got here.
 

DepWraith

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
887
Location
Pinellas Park, Fl
You'll find that police are 11 times more likely to kill innocent bystanders than ccw holders.
(Is this because they are involved in 11 times more shootings than civilians? No proof of anything here)


Similar studies have shown that ccw owners are less likely to miss and discharge their weapons less frequently (the latter is mentioned there) with fewer rounds fired.
(Probably because most ccw owners shootings are against 1 assailant at a time. Probably shoot less because they think one bullet stops the bad guys like I'm the movies, lol)

One of the reasons is that people that carry daily are generally enthusiasts and are more likely to be at the range in their spare time.
(Pretty sure every cop I've ever known carries daily, so????)

Many of the friends that I frequent the range with are police and I easily frequent the range 20x more.

(So because your cop friends go less than you everyone else does to?)

This summer I did two practicals a week plus whatever time I spent at the range goofing off with friends.
(Goofing off...enough said)


The result is the complete and utter destruction of these officer friends in competition.
(Targets don't shoot back, ever been in a real shoot out?)


By all standards they are terrible shots and the way they recount qualification sessions leads me to believe much of their department has trouble qualifying every year in what I consider menial firearm exercises.

(I suggest you find better friends then and go ahead and show them this thread too)

The old phrase that practice makes perfect applies here.

(Well, not sure what you do for a living, but you should quit and go teach the military, FBI, CIA, Secret Service and anybody else who issues firearms because you are clearly the best in the world)
 
Last edited:

sidewinderl

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Messages
303
Location
USA
We trust the lives of our children to these schools that we don't even trust with the capacity to actually protect them. That's the definition of insanity.
 

nickf2005

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
2,309
Location
IN
You'll find that police are 11 times more likely to kill innocent bystanders than ccw holders.
(Is this because they are involved in 11 times more shootings than civilians? No proof of anything here)
(True, no real conclusive numbers there.)

Similar studies have shown that ccw owners are less likely to miss and discharge their weapons less frequently (the latter is mentioned there) with fewer rounds fired.
(Probably because most ccw owners shootings are against 1 assailant at a time. Probably shoot less because they think one bullet stops the bad guys like I'm the movies, lol)
(And every police officer confronted with a gun is against 5 bad guys with a gun?)

One of the reasons is that people that carry daily are generally enthusiasts and are more likely to be at the range in their spare time.
(Pretty sure every cop I've ever known carries daily, so????)
Carrying daily =/= visiting range frequently. I think this was the point there.

Many of the friends that I frequent the range with are police and I easily frequent the range 20x more.
(So because your cop friends go less than you everyone else does to?)
(Would like to see a LEO chime in to see what the norm is on LEO's visiting the range.)

This summer I did two practicals a week plus whatever time I spent at the range goofing off with friends.
(Goofing off...enough said)
(Enough said? That "goofing off" is learning how to shoot their weapons more accurately. Not like they're just blindly wasting money on ammo.)


The result is the complete and utter destruction of these officer friends in competition.
(Targets don't shoot back, ever been in a real shoot out?)

(And you imply all cops have been in a shoot out? I've tried digging up stats of the percentage of LEO's involved in a shooting. I ran out of patience.)

See above.
 

DepWraith

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
887
Location
Pinellas Park, Fl
Fact is most shootings are within 7 yards, and most even closer than that. Even the worst cop I've ever worked with has hit the target consistently at that distance.

Somebody has left out the fact that we run into places that others are running out of. Don't give me how you would because unless you are doing it or have done it you don't know what you would do. If you aren't LEO/Military at one point then you probably don't know what I'm really talking about.

It's easy to speculate what you would do all day while sitting behind that desk and goofing off at the range, but signing on the dotted line and actually doing it is a completely different animal.
 

slidai

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
820
Location
NC
It wasn't huge news because the sandy story was just a couple days before and it's far better for "ratings" which is all the news people care about. Compare 20 children (5-6 years old) and 6 adults killed at a school vs. 1 lady and a guy shot by a cop. Stories like this happen a lot across the country but they are not sensational enough to trump something like the sandy tragedy.

I love the comments on that site. It's not some media cover-up, it's all about ratings. People need to remove the tin foil hat. Or at least loosen it up a little.
 

S8ER01Z

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
4,897
Location
Quad Cities
I know LEOs who can shoot with the best and I know LEOs who have missed a deer laying right in front of them after being struck by a vehicle. The answer is simple... allow us to carry but require a lot of training. Anyone who takes it serious will put in the time and we will all be better off.
 

Ry_Trapp0

Condom Model
Established Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
12,287
Location
Hebron, Ohio
I know LEOs who can shoot with the best and I know LEOs who have missed a deer laying right in front of them after being struck by a vehicle. The answer is simple... allow us to carry but require a lot of training. Anyone who takes it serious will put in the time and we will all be better off.
that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.
 

slidai

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
820
Location
NC
Here's the problem with people carrying and incidents like the theater shooting. Say you shot at the criminal and happen to hit or kill someone else. Your ass would get sued up and down. That's just the culture we have. Something has to be done about that part in my opinion.
 

nickf2005

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
2,309
Location
IN
that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.

Not to mention a source of revenue. The US of A could use some money right now...


Here's the problem with people carrying and incidents like the theater shooting. Say you shot at the criminal and happen to hit or kill someone else. Your ass would get sued up and down. That's just the culture we have. Something has to be done about that part in my opinion.

This is not a problem, it is a known risk by carriers. If you shoot, miss the criminal, and hit an innocent bystander, then being sued is your last worry. You're going to be looking at homicide charges yourself.
 

bluebosss197

im did asbestos i can
Established Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
2,265
Location
Lone Star Nation
This news is starting to spread like wildfire on facebook. I don't have FB anymore, but my fiance has counted more than 10 different instances of this being posted thus far.
 

Blown 89

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
8,726
Location
AZ
It's easy to speculate what you would do all day while sitting behind that desk and goofing off at the range, but signing on the dotted line and actually doing it is a completely different animal.
If you weren't so full of yourself you might open yourself up to improvement. Those pitiful civilians you look down upon are actively improving their skill set and many are revolutionizing the way you do your job in the process. Some of those guys that sit behind desks all day get off work and lay waste to everyone else at the matches that your departments replicate for training. I do goof off at the range from time to time but in your rush to puff out your chest and assassinate my character you conveniently ignored my comments about competing and practicing to better my skills. I expected better from an officer.

You are right, our targets don't shoot back but neither do the targets you train with to prepare yourselves for the same exact situations so when you get your ass handed to you by some average Joe in the same training scenarios what does that say about your preparedness? Just because you are running into situations unarmed people are running away from doesn't make you God's gift to accuracy and performance. Similarly, simply being an officer doesn't make you God's gift to firearms.

In response to your comment about police being involved in more shooting thus having higher accidents: 11% of police shootings kill an innocent person vs 2% of ccw shootings. gunfacts.info.

I'm not God's gift to firearms either but at least I'm not fooling myself into thinking that I am which opens myself up to continued and accelerated improvement. I wish every officer, gun owner, and military member worked half as hard at perfecting their skills as the guys and girls that frequent USPSA matches. The world would be a better place if everyone were better and safer with their firearms.

I'm not spending any more of my time chasing down facts for someone who would rather be condescending and rude in return. My opinion is that police could benefit from better training and I support a skilled ccw society and that's the end of it.
 
Last edited:

DepWraith

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
887
Location
Pinellas Park, Fl
Never said I didn't support a skilled ccw population and never said I was full of myself; simply stated that regardless of the training at the range, that doesn't give you the unique mindset to actively seek out an active shooter and eliminate the threat.

As for your 2% and 11% numbers, (which are from 1994),could it be that ccw shootings are usually confined to very non populated situations as compared to where the law enforcement shootings happen?

I'm all for people having better training but was simply stating that to say ccw are generally more well trained than police officers is ridiculous. There are always exceptions to every rule.

Anyway, hope everyone keeps safe and has a great new year.
 

strongs_2009

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
197
Location
Daytona Beach FL
In the end the only thing that will stop a bad man on a rampage with a gun is a good person with a gun willing to use it. I shoot 1000s of rounds thru my pistol and M4 that I carry for work. I get free and unlimited ammo to shoot and I take full advantage of it. But it still does not change the fact of anything. A person who really never shoots could just be there at the right place the wrong time and be able to save lives because they did have a gun. Say like the movie theater if I was sitting in the front row shooter comes in from the back do you honestly think I would get a clear shot at them. Slim chance unless everyone stays in there seat. So ok say someone that just has a pistol is in the back row he/or she has a chance but does hit 1 wrong person but kills the shooter. Ok yeah not really wanted but is that not better then who knows how many people losing their life because no one can defend anyone. Yep I do agree people who want to carry should be out there shooting to make sure there up on their weapon they are wanting to carry but even they can’t make it I would feel safer knowing my family has a fighting chance over just sitting there being a target and having go thru the feeling of they might be killed. And a lot of places you have to qualify on a curtain weapon you want on your CCW.
Now onto the gun ban who does it really pertain to and have an impact on. Everyone but that person sitting there thinking up the stupid law. I mean the people sitting there making the law up are all protected by people carrying guns. If they feel that no one should have guns why don’t they give up their body guards and the guns that they have them carry. I don’t think you will ever see that happen. Can’t remember her name is but banned being able to carry in her area but was caught herself carrying a concealed pistol. So why does she have the right to defend herself but the rest don’t? Situations like that have happened over and over all over the place. Another one a guy votes for the gun ban but shoots someone breaking into his own home. Yep sure looks like her is against guns right. My job is to protect most of these douche bags I have protected just about all the congress and senators up to Biden, Obama, Con Rice while she was still up there McCain you know it. So I get to meet most of them on a personal level and would like to beat half of them myself after having to listen to the views on how they feel things should be most of the time.
But hey if some people feel gun should be ban more power to them then don’t own one or carry one. But don’t look at someone who does when something happens to you or your family and be like oh why did they not help us. If you do believe in gun and carrying them thank you for being man enough to take that chance and willing to help if needed to.

Ok that is enough of my rant.
 

Planter

Banned
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
15,554
Location
In the 5280'
You'll find that police are 11 times more likely to kill innocent bystanders than ccw holders.
(Is this because they are involved in 11 times more shootings than civilians? No proof of anything here)


Similar studies have shown that ccw owners are less likely to miss and discharge their weapons less frequently (the latter is mentioned there) with fewer rounds fired.
(Probably because most ccw owners shootings are against 1 assailant at a time. Probably shoot less because they think one bullet stops the bad guys like I'm the movies, lol)

One of the reasons is that people that carry daily are generally enthusiasts and are more likely to be at the range in their spare time.
(Pretty sure every cop I've ever known carries daily, so????)

Many of the friends that I frequent the range with are police and I easily frequent the range 20x more.

(So because your cop friends go less than you everyone else does to?)

This summer I did two practicals a week plus whatever time I spent at the range goofing off with friends.
(Goofing off...enough said)


The result is the complete and utter destruction of these officer friends in competition.
(Targets don't shoot back, ever been in a real shoot out?)


By all standards they are terrible shots and the way they recount qualification sessions leads me to believe much of their department has trouble qualifying every year in what I consider menial firearm exercises.

(I suggest you find better friends then and go ahead and show them this thread too)

The old phrase that practice makes perfect applies here.

(Well, not sure what you do for a living, but you should quit and go teach the military, FBI, CIA, Secret Service and anybody else who issues firearms because you are clearly the best in the world)

why don't you try linking some proven stats/facts to your statement here. it might make it appear somewhat more valid.


that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.

not just range training. but actual handling qualification, and scenario training on an actual situation course.

i'd be all for this.

in fact, I'm of the opinion it should be a year long course for high school seniors. of course under controlled environments with professionals.
 

Sonic605hp

Resident Prick.
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
26,076
Location
Surrounded by libetards.
Get out of here with your facts. :) Buy guns while you can boys the socialists are taking over.

I copied this from another forum. Please put up facts that support you in the position that assault rifles increase the murder rate.

A LITTLE GUN CONTROL HISTORY

In 1911, Turkey established gun control.
From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.
From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

Germany established gun control in 1938 and
from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were
unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

China established gun control in 1935.
From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

Guatemala established gun control in 1964.
From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---- ------------- -------------

Uganda established gun control in 1970.
From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

Cambodia established gun control in 1956.
From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated
in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------



It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. In 2002 -- five years after enacting its gun ban -- the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner.

Even Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:

In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
Moreover, Australia and the United States -- where no gun-ban exists -- both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:

Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America's rate dropped 31.7 percent.
During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.



http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/...useronline.pdf

This Article has reviewed a significant amount of evidence from a wide variety of international sources. Each individual portion of evidence is subject to cavil—at the very least the general objection that the persuasiveness of social scientific evidence cannot remotely approach the persuasiveness of conclusions in the physical sciences. Nevertheless, the bur‐ den of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, espe‐ cially since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra.149 To bear that burden would at the very least require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world.

Over a decade ago, Professor Brandon Centerwall of the Uni‐ versity of Washington undertook an extensive, statistically sophis‐ ticated study comparing areas in the United States and Canada to determine whether Canada’s more restrictive policies had better contained criminal violence. When he published his results it was with the admonition:

If you are surprised by [our] finding, so [are we]. [We] did not begin this research with any intent to “exonerate” hand‐ guns, but there it is—a negative finding, to be sure, but a nega‐ tive finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.150



http://www.examiner.com/article/medi...-armed-citizen

Here are a few facts about armed Americans:

-In 1982, the town of Kennesaw, Georgia, passed an ordinance which required all heads of household to have at least one gun in the house. The burglary rate immediately dropped an astounding 89 percent. Ten years after the law was passed, the burglary rate was still 72 percent less than it was in 1981.

-Armed citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as the police do every year in this country (1,527 to 606).

-A 1996 University of Chicago study concluded that states which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rates by 8.5 percent, rapes by 5 percent, aggravated assaults by 7 percent, and robbery by 3 percent.

-According to the National Safety Council, with guns being used 2.5 million times a year in self defense against criminals, firearms are actually used more than 80 times more often to protect lives, rather than to take lives.

-A 1979 Justice Department study entitled Rape Victimization in American Cities, concluded that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32 percent were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3 percent of the attempted rapes were actually committed.

-Another Justice Department study found that 57 percent of felons agreed that "criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running the police."
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top