I think we can all agree that there are Amazing civilian AND Law Enforcement marksman as well as some that aren't so great!
A prepertrator is on a Suicide mission and wont get to far if they try to pull Mass Shooting in Texas.
Quit being an idiot, no one wants to force guns upon the people, people should be allowed to carry IF THEY PLEASE. Fact of the matter is, most school faculty that agrees to carry in a school is not only because they understand that the only thing that might have saved some lives in that tragedy would be a trained armed individual but also because they more than likely already have a gun and have practice. You're making it seem like you're ALLOWING teachers to carry yet they don't know what a trigger. People that are pro 2A is because they've been around guns and understand that we don't live in a utopia, most anti gun people are just knee jerk liberals who only come out of the woodwork when something like this happens, this is really easy to spot since 99% of them have little to know knowledge on guns.
i said that is what people are saying.. just hand guns to janitors and teachers.
i have been seeing people say it since the shooting.
i'm not assuming that's what they are saying...that IS what they're saying.
no matter how they get it, choosing or not, it's a dumb idea.
i can't believe anyone here wants more people to have guns.
too many on this site alone have arsenals and are crazy enough to actually believe they're going to be fighting our own government one day.
You'll find that police are 11 times more likely to kill innocent bystanders than ccw holders.
(Is this because they are involved in 11 times more shootings than civilians? No proof of anything here)
(True, no real conclusive numbers there.)
Similar studies have shown that ccw owners are less likely to miss and discharge their weapons less frequently (the latter is mentioned there) with fewer rounds fired.
(Probably because most ccw owners shootings are against 1 assailant at a time. Probably shoot less because they think one bullet stops the bad guys like I'm the movies, lol)
(And every police officer confronted with a gun is against 5 bad guys with a gun?)
One of the reasons is that people that carry daily are generally enthusiasts and are more likely to be at the range in their spare time.
(Pretty sure every cop I've ever known carries daily, so????)
Carrying daily =/= visiting range frequently. I think this was the point there.
Many of the friends that I frequent the range with are police and I easily frequent the range 20x more.
(So because your cop friends go less than you everyone else does to?)
(Would like to see a LEO chime in to see what the norm is on LEO's visiting the range.)
This summer I did two practicals a week plus whatever time I spent at the range goofing off with friends.
(Goofing off...enough said)
(Enough said? That "goofing off" is learning how to shoot their weapons more accurately. Not like they're just blindly wasting money on ammo.)
The result is the complete and utter destruction of these officer friends in competition.
(Targets don't shoot back, ever been in a real shoot out?)
(And you imply all cops have been in a shoot out? I've tried digging up stats of the percentage of LEO's involved in a shooting. I ran out of patience.)
that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.I know LEOs who can shoot with the best and I know LEOs who have missed a deer laying right in front of them after being struck by a vehicle. The answer is simple... allow us to carry but require a lot of training. Anyone who takes it serious will put in the time and we will all be better off.
that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.
Here's the problem with people carrying and incidents like the theater shooting. Say you shot at the criminal and happen to hit or kill someone else. Your ass would get sued up and down. That's just the culture we have. Something has to be done about that part in my opinion.
If you weren't so full of yourself you might open yourself up to improvement. Those pitiful civilians you look down upon are actively improving their skill set and many are revolutionizing the way you do your job in the process. Some of those guys that sit behind desks all day get off work and lay waste to everyone else at the matches that your departments replicate for training. I do goof off at the range from time to time but in your rush to puff out your chest and assassinate my character you conveniently ignored my comments about competing and practicing to better my skills. I expected better from an officer.It's easy to speculate what you would do all day while sitting behind that desk and goofing off at the range, but signing on the dotted line and actually doing it is a completely different animal.
You'll find that police are 11 times more likely to kill innocent bystanders than ccw holders.
(Is this because they are involved in 11 times more shootings than civilians? No proof of anything here)
Similar studies have shown that ccw owners are less likely to miss and discharge their weapons less frequently (the latter is mentioned there) with fewer rounds fired.
(Probably because most ccw owners shootings are against 1 assailant at a time. Probably shoot less because they think one bullet stops the bad guys like I'm the movies, lol)
One of the reasons is that people that carry daily are generally enthusiasts and are more likely to be at the range in their spare time.
(Pretty sure every cop I've ever known carries daily, so????)
Many of the friends that I frequent the range with are police and I easily frequent the range 20x more.
(So because your cop friends go less than you everyone else does to?)
This summer I did two practicals a week plus whatever time I spent at the range goofing off with friends.
(Goofing off...enough said)
The result is the complete and utter destruction of these officer friends in competition.
(Targets don't shoot back, ever been in a real shoot out?)
By all standards they are terrible shots and the way they recount qualification sessions leads me to believe much of their department has trouble qualifying every year in what I consider menial firearm exercises.
(I suggest you find better friends then and go ahead and show them this thread too)
The old phrase that practice makes perfect applies here.
(Well, not sure what you do for a living, but you should quit and go teach the military, FBI, CIA, Secret Service and anybody else who issues firearms because you are clearly the best in the world)
that's not bad, i wouldn't be against required annual training or something for CCW. while it would cost a few bucks annually of course, that would benefit everyone.
I copied this from another forum. Please put up facts that support you in the position that assault rifles increase the murder rate.
A LITTLE GUN CONTROL HISTORY
In 1911, Turkey established gun control.
From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.
From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and
from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were
unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935.
From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964.
From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---- ------------- -------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970.
From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956.
From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated
in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. In 2002 -- five years after enacting its gun ban -- the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner.
Even Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:
In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
Moreover, Australia and the United States -- where no gun-ban exists -- both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:
Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America's rate dropped 31.7 percent.
During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/...useronline.pdf
This Article has reviewed a significant amount of evidence from a wide variety of international sources. Each individual portion of evidence is subject to cavil—at the very least the general objection that the persuasiveness of social scientific evidence cannot remotely approach the persuasiveness of conclusions in the physical sciences. Nevertheless, the bur‐ den of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, espe‐ cially since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra.149 To bear that burden would at the very least require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world.
Over a decade ago, Professor Brandon Centerwall of the Uni‐ versity of Washington undertook an extensive, statistically sophis‐ ticated study comparing areas in the United States and Canada to determine whether Canada’s more restrictive policies had better contained criminal violence. When he published his results it was with the admonition:
If you are surprised by [our] finding, so [are we]. [We] did not begin this research with any intent to “exonerate” hand‐ guns, but there it is—a negative finding, to be sure, but a nega‐ tive finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.150
http://www.examiner.com/article/medi...-armed-citizen
Here are a few facts about armed Americans:
-In 1982, the town of Kennesaw, Georgia, passed an ordinance which required all heads of household to have at least one gun in the house. The burglary rate immediately dropped an astounding 89 percent. Ten years after the law was passed, the burglary rate was still 72 percent less than it was in 1981.
-Armed citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as the police do every year in this country (1,527 to 606).
-A 1996 University of Chicago study concluded that states which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rates by 8.5 percent, rapes by 5 percent, aggravated assaults by 7 percent, and robbery by 3 percent.
-According to the National Safety Council, with guns being used 2.5 million times a year in self defense against criminals, firearms are actually used more than 80 times more often to protect lives, rather than to take lives.
-A 1979 Justice Department study entitled Rape Victimization in American Cities, concluded that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32 percent were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3 percent of the attempted rapes were actually committed.
-Another Justice Department study found that 57 percent of felons agreed that "criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running the police."