While I'm in manual 90% of the time, there's still something to be said for being able to fire up one of the semi-auto/auto modes and poppin' off a shot.
So the Nikons are about the same as canons. My only DSLR experience is with my 20D and my friends 1D so i didnt know.
User Interface, shutter sound, ergonomics and body/feel are all different, but images for the most part are stellar across the different brands of DSLR. The real differences in image quality come into play at higher ISO.
Generally if you have a DSLR of ANY brand and a good knowledge of Photoshop, Lightroom or Aperture, you're going to be able to produce some very nice pictures.
Sorry, the pictures are less than adequate. What's with the not enough time had to leave in in auto mode? Put it in aperture priority and shoot.
If you can shoot a D50, you can use a D90. Stop buying cameras and learn how to use one. I could and have done much better with a Nikon CoolPix 950.
Cleavage or ban!
Nice pics, very crisp!
whats up briansvt aka svtgolf. its supercharged from dcresource.com
awesome cobra!
You go with your Nikon Coolpix :shrug:
BTW- I dont recall ever saying I did not know how to use the D50 - or the
D90. I said the D90 is much more advanced - but for you its probably childs play right ? :rollseyes
Oh yes....... these were in auto mode simply because I did not have alot of time
I think thats why we were questioning it. It doesnt take more than a few seconds to set the f stop and shutter speed, which would have netted much better pictures. And ya, sigma has came a long way. I use a Sigma EX DG 20mm 1.8 most of the time. But there is a clear difference between it and my 50mm 1.4 Ultrasonic canon. From now on all my money will be invested in L glass starting with the 70-200mm I have in layaway.