Agreed, thats why my shop is a VMP authorized dealer and installer, lol.
Saaaaalute!
Bj
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Agreed, thats why my shop is a VMP authorized dealer and installer, lol.
Everyone believes in what they sell and have to support that. I believe (just my opinion) there is misinformation starting to come out. I can be wrong and admit that. To say I took a 2.3 and made more HP than a 2.9 at same boost totally amuses me. That's the case why go bigger.
Time to walk the ban line. There is only one vendor I have ever dealt with that was totally honest and not pushing his product. Van @ REVAN RACING. I spoke to him about my goals and I have a Whipple.
If that was the case, why have a 5.8 if the 5.4 will make more HP. I have no problem betting the 5.8 makes more HP than the 5.4 and is easier. Rodfarva did the 2.9 maxing out and I know the Tvs can only dream of the power he was making. I have drug a Tvs car with all the bolt ons (didn't go into the motor) all over VA. TQ will e.t, HP will m.p.h. If you can use the few fps of TQ. The TVs makes you may get out a Tad bit. In the 1/4 you will get ran overtop of.
Sometimes less is more. Not a hard hit down low with the 2.9 but a bolo punch in the midrange when moving. Top it off with lower IATs and boost. Not knocking anyone, there's a Whipple Shelby that will try anyone in its league ( stock motor, you seen the thread) with a Tvs. Matter of fact pump gas /race fuel no matter. Stock motor without breaking open the valve covers with a TVs we can dance. Bolton whatever you need. I have my mods listed. You can even run higher boost and I still see the Whipple walking away. Looking forward to all donations that wanna try
Everyone believes in what they sell and have to support that. I believe (just my opinion) there is misinformation starting to come out. I can be wrong and admit that. To say I took a 2.3 and made more HP than a 2.9 at same boost totally amuses me. That's the case why go bigger.
Time to walk the ban line. There is only one vendor I have ever dealt with that was totally honest and not pushing his product. Van @ REVAN RACING. I spoke to him about my goals and I have a Whipple.
If that was the case, why have a 5.8 if the 5.4 will make more HP. I have no problem betting the 5.8 makes more HP than the 5.4 and is easier. Rodfarva did the 2.9 maxing out and I know the Tvs can only dream of the power he was making. I have drug a Tvs car with all the bolt ons (didn't go into the motor) all over VA. TQ will e.t, HP will m.p.h. If you can use the few fps of TQ. The TVs makes you may get out a Tad bit. In the 1/4 you will get ran overtop of.
Sometimes less is more. Not a hard hit down low with the 2.9 but a bolo punch in the midrange when moving. Top it off with lower IATs and boost. Not knocking anyone, there's a Whipple Shelby that will try anyone in its league ( stock motor, you seen the thread) with a Tvs. Matter of fact pump gas /race fuel no matter. Stock motor without breaking open the valve covers with a TVs we can dance. Bolton whatever you need. I have my mods listed. You can even run higher boost and I still see the Whipple walking away. Looking forward to all donations that wanna try
Where's your time slips? How come ford put a TVS 2.3 on their record setting 2013 Shelby then, why not a twin screw?
No offense, but that is a rediculous arguemnt. Do you really believe there nobody in the aftermarket makes anything better than what comes on the car from the factory?
The TVS will make more power on the low end because of the boost curves. Due to the rotor profile of twin screws, boost typically ramps up more on the big end. The twin scerews will make more power on the big end given the same psi, mainly because of the lower parasitic drag. With a 2.6" upper and 10% lower you are spinning the TVS a lot harder to make the same boost as a kenne bell or whipple with a 3" upper only. It takes power to to do this.
The questions are, or should be:
1) Is the 50 lb/ft at the bottom of the tack worth losing the 20-30whp up top.
and
2) Do you want your race gas tune to pick up ~40whp with the TVS, or over 100+whp with with a twin screw and a pulley swap? Same goes for e85 for the people fortunate enough to have it.
Justin's TVS car makes good power, but it is running cams and race gas. The twin screws will make more power than that just by switching to race gas and swapping pullies.
How do u figure its not valid, how many TVS's do u hear about pissing oil into the intake or having bypass valves blow up .....not many , can't say the same for the twin screws. RELIABILITY plays a huge part in items I install in my vehicles and what I recommend to my customers and friends.....u can keep the 15hp @ 21 psi , ill take oem reliability any day. Someone with a 2.9 needs to race Senkak if they are in Florida....his car on 21psi was just a tad over my old white vert power wise and yea running 10.30's @ 138mph , guess he's using that 50lb/ft pretty well....lol.
I can pull up Atleast 5 pages of rebuild threads on twinscrews....matter of fact , call whipple and tell them u.want to DD a 3.4 with 26#'s of boost and see what they say.....my.biggest point about the TVS vs world of twin screws is once u go over 21psi its a different ball game....you need race gas and your tempting fate on a stock motor. So by in large the.majority of the people on these forums would benefit from a TVS power band over a 2.9 at the same boost level....if I wanted to go race, I would strap a 4.0 whipple on my car with 28#'s of boost and e85.
A ported eaton can beat a tvs/whipple in the hands of the right driver at the strip. Suspension, tires, driver ability and who gets out of the hole first are the winner there, it's not who makes the most power. On the street a bigger blower is going to run over top of the smaller blower the longer your in it, I'm not sure what the debate really is on that.
3 years old tho!great read guys
3 years old tho!
3 years old tho!