If all were the same (track, driver, weather..yadda yadda) the mach would be a few tenths faster. Having said that....you rarely have the 'same' conditions to be able to have a for sure comparison. looking at the car, the mach is faster.......here's why..
TQ curve and peak numbers.
Solid rear
3.55s
THe HP dyno numbers are very close (peak). The HP curve is also very close. The weight difference is so minimal you can't really look at it. A few tenths is close enough for it to be a driver's race though.
TQ curve and peak numbers.
Solid rear
3.55s
THe HP dyno numbers are very close (peak). The HP curve is also very close. The weight difference is so minimal you can't really look at it. A few tenths is close enough for it to be a driver's race though.