^ the **** is wrong with these sick ****s and the parents that are allowing their kids to do this. JFC
both her parents were porn stars so....
No problem, but its going to be hard for you to talk with dicks constantly jumping in your mouth after changing it.P.S. I'm going to change my avatar to Kaepernick
Can i ask how you even know about a topless scene?@Steve@TF
parents. smdh
17 years old
Since Thora Birch was barely 17 years old at the time she made the film, and thus classified as a minor in the United States, her parents had to approve her brief topless scene in the movie, and they and child labor representatives were on the set for the shooting of it.
When I saw steves post I googled "what age was Thora Birch....blahh blaah"Can i ask how you even know about a topless scene?
Welcome to 2020
where someone said “ an underage girl showing her tits is okay because it was a good movie “
At the same time no laws broken with this show. So its a 1A thing, no matter how nasty this is. Really a tough one to deal with if you argue all sides. Unless you put laws/rules on the books its fair game. Censorship is a spider egg. Hard to poke without having to burn the whole house down.
The funny thing is a lot of comments defending the movie on news articles are coming from women. for exampleWelcome to 2020
where someone said “ an underage girl showing her tits is okay because it was a good movie “
You already said that, you pervert.
7 posts on a forum and already defending pedophilia. I hope to see LL's old banhammer very soon.
You already said that, you pervert.
7 posts on a forum and already defending pedophilia. I hope to see LL's old banhammer very soon.
So are you really trying to say this movie is ok because it can make money? Seriously, that is your legit defense of this movie? You do realize people make money off trafficking kids for sex right? Guess that is ok because there is a market for it.
You are a sick individual who clearly has no moral standards. Who cares if worse stuff is out there. Doesn't mean we should be ok with a company encouraging children to act like strippers.
We most definitely can tell people to not watch this. Its borderline child pornography. Children deserve to be protected, not preyed upon by perverts. This movie is a perversion.
It makes no difference what the motive is for making the film if the content is morally wrong. If you can't wrap your head around that, I can only assume you approve of the content, your pathetic attempt at denying so aside.
And to this hd117 knucklehead. This is nothing to do with conservative vs liberal. It is right vs wrong. Get your shit together and stand for something.
Signatures are for pus... oh, wait...
Will you GTFO here. If you’re going to use all your big words to make your pedo acceptance seem ok, at least spell check your shit.
“BLM is doing God’s work”
2KblackGT
svtperformance.com mobile app
That's not the point. We get it, we can choose to watch it or not or subscribe to netflix or not. But regardless of that, it is never acceptable to produce soft core child pornography. And that is what this is.
Ban Please.
View attachment 1662469
He's one of three things.
1.Existing member who created a fake account to troll or promote his "alternative lifestyle".
2. Chinese bot sent to spread propaganda and either support pedos or run PR interference for Netflix.
3. FBI/Vox agent trying to build a case to smear SVTPF as a nest of fringe Trump supporters.
Either way, this "74 year old pedo apologist" is not a community member.
Die in a wildfire, Pedobear.
HD117 - child explotation is a line which should not be crossed, profits be damned.
HD117 - Like everything else people produce what sells. Politics aside, profit is what drives most any endeavor.
Disgusting.
Again, you miss the point. Crap like this is produced for one reason...to make money. Those who choose to watch it do so because that is their prerogative. Is the subject material proper? Not to me, but then I can't tell you what you should or should not watch. Netflix is a business. And as such you may or may not subscribe. That's your choice. But I hate to tell you that this movie is rather tame compared to the crap that young adults have access to on their phones and tablets.
And traffickers are making money by exploiting underage girls too so is that just their prerogative? What kind of laxidasical morals do you live by? Your justification for illegal activity, like child pornography, is the question of whether they are making money off of it as opposed to receiving strictly a pleasure response? What the **** is wrong with you? Did it occur to you at all that your replies on here make you look as though you are sympathetic to the material being portrayed and have something to gain from it? Because you are on the complete opposite end of the spectrum as the rest of us. We are proponents of more child protections and less exploitation and you are advocating that everyone just look away, just let it happen and don't say anything if you don't like it. I'll remember that the next time I see an article about a young girl who has been kidnapped in order to be trafficked to pedophiles. It's just their prerogative, right?
The funny thing is a lot of comments defending the movie on news articles are coming from women. for example
View attachment 1663307
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk