19.4 psi on pump?op:
Why? I ran a 2.3 Whipple @ 22lbs on 93 octane for a couple of years and was hard on the car. Think it made 610hp on that gas. 660hp on C16 if I remember correctly.
Kenne Bell 2.2 Dyno Numbers List
- Thread starter blksvtCOBRA714
- Start date
Why? I ran a 2.3 Whipple @ 22lbs on 93 octane for a couple of years and was hard on the car. Think it made 610hp on that gas. 660hp on C16 if I remember correctly.
Well. I will pass on the long winded conversation on opinions that follow because I respect you and your opinion as a person.
I however even on 93 (which I will say would be SAFER then 91, but still not good) wouldnt not run almost 20lbs of boost on my engine. Not without taking a ton of timing out.
But thats me and thats my engine and my opinon
I however even on 93 (which I will say would be SAFER then 91, but still not good) wouldnt not run almost 20lbs of boost on my engine. Not without taking a ton of timing out.
But thats me and thats my engine and my opinon
Blankenship's dyno is ran in DynoJet mode and it's dead nuts.
I should know my car has only made 150 pulls on it and the numbers compared to others are the same every time or higher because of someone's ports.:thumbsup:
Don't be starting the whole debate on Mustang Dyno's and super low numbers. I don't know of 1 shop that does not use a conversion factor of something. If it weren't converted then my setup at 660hp would've been like 550hp in true MD mode. So shops will not run off customers by running it without a conversion. I was there for that also and about crapped my pants when the numbers were super low.
So KRSONE's numbers are spot on.:rockon:
I should know my car has only made 150 pulls on it and the numbers compared to others are the same every time or higher because of someone's ports.:thumbsup:
Don't be starting the whole debate on Mustang Dyno's and super low numbers. I don't know of 1 shop that does not use a conversion factor of something. If it weren't converted then my setup at 660hp would've been like 550hp in true MD mode. So shops will not run off customers by running it without a conversion. I was there for that also and about crapped my pants when the numbers were super low.
So KRSONE's numbers are spot on.:rockon:
:banana:
Thanks. I got lucky when I bought the car. It's already extensively modded. My injectors(80lbs) need to to be upgraded but the fuel system is good to beyond what I need it to do.
Damn some solid numbers in here, just wonder if I lucked out on the torque factor or what? I will say though not all shops use a conversion factor. The one I used did not and I did not convert my numbers either. We had a car that made 510 RWHP at another shop with a dynojet and the owner hasn't changed a thing and car has very few miles on it and I believe made 444 RWHP and that was a stage 3 ported Eaton car so it should be right in the 510 range. He even had sheets from the previous dyno and when converted were just about dead nuts on. I don't understand the whole thing because I don't see my car making 759 RWHP and 770 RWTQ on a 2.2 at 21-22 PSI even on E85! So I just went with the 660 which seemed about right to me. Gonna re-dyno and retune this winter since I found out the car has 3 low cylinders. Quick freshen up and some spray and see what she will do then! Love seeing these mid to upper 600 2.2 cars! Keep em coming guys!
Bro u were surprised? I have mine runnin a 3.00 upper 2lb lower supposed to be 19psi tuner calls me and says 21.7 psi I'm like what the f!? Pissed cause now I have a car that's reliant on torco which I never buy...long story short car made 632/566 thru stock manifolds and bassani catted x at 21.7psi and 19 degrees of timing so I'm sorta happy but guess what I only ever put 93 in it and torco takes damn near 2 weeks to ship to Delaware so I've given up goin wot I boost maybe 10-12 psi on occasion just to break my tires loose in 2nd gear then stop and drive like a bitch again...I'm wonderin if I should just say f it and go wot on 93 hell I'm 19 degrees
I'm so close to buying 80lb injectors, long tubes,orx and gettin 335 Hoosier drag radials and runnin e85 just so I can be in love withy car again....heat soaked on street tires and havin a passenger in my pig of a vert I got beat from a 40 roll by my buddy's port eaton coupe he was in 2nd I was in 3rd....lame huh considering I make 117 more hp at the wheels than him I was catching him by 120 tho lol
No way! Maybe 15*s or lower. Do not do it at your level on 93 octane. I did it on 22lbs but my Tuner had it set up very safe for the 93 octane tune. I drove it hard like that too. But when the car was cool or after driving for a long period to get it cooled down. Not from every stoplight.
brian its all in my manifolds and catted x who knows i prob got a blockage somewhere ive never heard or seen such high psi from a 19lb setup u think if i have my tuner set me from 19* to 15* of timing ill be sub 600whp?
Guess I gotta thank Parker for the tune then. Car def rips hard. Im running a 3.0 upper with a 4lb lower which holds a steady 21 and peaks to 22 psi. Glad we don't have emission checks here for that stuff at least. I would def not got WOT on 19 psi on 93 at all with that kinda timing. Your gonna end up with a mess in the oil pan I would think!
lol true story
Thats my current pulley combo and am hoping for very similar numbers. Then Im gonna put on a 2.76 upper and see what it does.
Good luck on that. Don't think the 2.2 has much more in it beyond 21-22 psi in all honesty. My IAT2s get stupid high after a pull even after a cold soak. My next mod is a killer chiller way before upping anymore boost just to keep IATs in check some more. Granted the spray helps but just want more peace of mind.
im trying to drop my boost from 21.7 to 19 ish my blower was stupid hot in the summer i could only imagine what i wouldve made if it wasnt heat soaked on the dyno
Users who are viewing this thread
