It will get a lot of attention as it already has.wow rip officers.
sucks this will get zero attention.
Now this cracks me up. A guy who isnt even white, decides to use his business and celebrate "White people" for a day and BOOM the government says that if somebody files a complaint its pretty much over for him. lol Check it out for yourself.... and the government will Outlaw"White Appreciation Day" so they say
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/08/yel...lares_june_11th_to_be_white_appreciation_day/
Yet Milliken Colorado has 196 vendors within 20 miles that accept an NAACP "perk card" for discounts.
https://naacp.perkscardnetwork.com/en/Pages/Home.aspx
I hope this guy sticks to his guns. Black hypocrisy.
Wow, that is ****ing ridiculous. As a side note, this proves there really is a race card, and nets discounts everywhere.
:lol1: Somehow the fact that it's a legit race card eluded me, but you're right. :beer:
The only problem is the NAACP is not a "Black only" group. They have white members and white perk cardholders. So technically it wouldnt be considered discrimination, the perk card is a member benefit of being part of the group, just like being a AAA Member. However at first look it does sound bad to those that do not know the NAACP membership is open to all races.
The BBQ joint owner is still not discriminating, he is simply offering a discount to a protected class. You see this everywhere. Ladies night at a bar (sex). Military discount at Lowes (veteran). Disabled person getting free admission to a National Park (Disability).
He isn't refusing service.
1 channel out of how many is to much? Just trying to clarify if you're complaining about there being a channel catered to black people. Did you just call me a race baiter lol? prove it.
He wasn't all the way on the ground yet.
Should have been faster.
It will get a lot of attention as it already has.
It is definitely is a sad situation.
The difference is that the murderers will get treated like murderers and the justice system will have its way with them like the criminals they are. That is why the story won't stay in the news. Justice will be served and there will be a reasonable conclusion to the events.
Officers breaking the law does not play out the same and that is why it stays in the media longer.
Dude just because you get a few guys on a car forum to agree with you about things that cant be proven doesnt mean they are right lol. Im sure there are plenty of people in this world that will see both sides as right lol, However you have your opinion and i have mine and thats exactly what they are OPINIONS and not facts.
Your frustrated cause this IS NOT YOUR GRANDFATHER'S AMERICA. You've lost it. Its gone. There used to be a time where you could use the N-Word in public to their face. Now if your employer sees it on your Facebook page you could lose your job. That burns you cause you can never get it back. Your forefathers screwed it up so bad that now the same country you love now caters to the same groups your forefathers disregarded as trash: the blacks, hispanics, gays, handicaps. How does that dirt taste?
:lol:
If you think being black affords you some kind of special treatment you're wrong. Sierra “C-Babi” McCurdy, of Laurel, Miss., just lost her job because she praised the cold-blooded murders of two Hattiesburg cops on Social Media.
'Merica strikes back! :lol1:
http://nypost.com/2015/05/10/subway-faces-backlash-after-worker-cheers-deaths-of-2-cops/
There are key differences actually. In virtually all of these cases the deaths of the individuals were as a result of police contact that started with some type of criminal behavior on the part of the individual. Now...we can argue and debate the level of force that was taken that ultimately lead to each of the individuals death, but make no mistake, their behavior lead to the initial encounter. Perhaps the level of force that was taken by the police in some of these cases was criminal? In many of the cases it was deemed to be appropriate. In some like Baltimore and in SC it was not, but none of those cops caused the individuals to do what they did prior to the force being applied. What they did was make a bad and perhaps criminal decision in the heat of an otherwise lawful arrest. In the murders of the police officers it is cut and dry. The perpetrators made a conscious decision to execute the cops for doing nothing more than their jobs. I'm sorry but the two cannot be compared.Please don't dignify that guy's idiocy with responses. BET hasn't been a black run channel since Bob Johnson sold it to MTV. The only thing on BET is the same stereotypical crap. "Oh! But they have shows that depict rich black people!" Yeah, and they're still scripted to do ratchet ass behavior.
Doesn't matter. If he reacted too fast, he'd have been shot like that guy in SC who was going for his license like the cop TOLD HIM to do.
Bingo! It's one thing for someone to kill a cop and get sent up the creek for it. It's something totally different for cops to kill unarmed suspects and get nothing more than a slap on the wrist for it, if that.
There are key differences actually. In virtually all of these cases the deaths of the individuals were as a result of police contact that started with some type of criminal behavior on the part of the individual. Now...we can argue and debate the level of force that was taken that ultimately lead to each of the individuals death, but make no mistake, their behavior lead to the initial encounter. Perhaps the level of force that was taken by the police in some of these cases was criminal? In many of the cases it was deemed to be appropriate. In some like Baltimore and in SC it was not, but none of those cops caused the individuals to do what they did prior to the force being applied. What they did was make a bad and perhaps criminal decision in the heat of an otherwise lawful arrest. In the murders of the police officers it is cut and dry. The perpetrators made a conscious decision to execute the cops for doing nothing more than their jobs. I'm sorry but the two cannot be compared.
Tamir Rice had a realistic looking plastic gun in his hand. If Tamir Rice had been waving a bottle of Coke around he would probably still be alive. Once again, his bad decision lead to the initial encounter. Once the encounter takes place, then it can be debated how much force was used and was it necessary.What did Tamir Rice do [to the cops] to warrant cops rolling up on him and murdering him in 1.2 seconds? What was Eric Garner doing that warranted him being choked out and sent into cardiac arrest? What was that autistic guy (I forget his name) doing when the cops gunned him down? He wasn't even looking at or approaching the officers or even showing any aggression whatsoever, yet he ended up with three slugs in his chest and one in his back after he was already down. (I blame his ****-ass mother for his death. She knew damned well what was going to happen to him when the cops showed up. You could tell by how she was nonchalantly easing out of the way when she opened the door crying her crocodile tears, screaming don't "Don't kill my baby!" She probably put whatever it was he had in his hands after the cops knocked on the door. The bitch didn't want to take care of him anymore and set him up for assassination.)
Tamir Rice had a realistic looking plastic gun in his hand. If Tamir Rice had been waving a bottle of Coke around he would probably still be alive.