Cool story bro. And with the price difference a 5.0 could be putting 600 down. Different class cars are different in class.
SAME! In a stock 5.0........Oh and the car bone stock before the tune ran 12.4@115 repeatable 1/4 runs and also ran 145mph trap at the chicago half mile.
Tell that to every asshat with a 5.0 that wants to race me at every light on every street ever. The fun never stops now that they all think their stock or mildly modified 5.0s are as fast as a stock LS3 vette. NOPE.
For comparison not a single 5.0 at the halfmile came close to my trap speeds at the big end.
I race cars that I know will beat me all the time. Ever think its just fun to run them and see what happens. And your dyno just proved that your stock ls3 IS as fast at a mildly modded 5.0
How does a poor sole with a child brain such as yours even hold a job that pays enough to buy a 35k car.
I race cars that I know will beat me all the time. Ever think its just fun to run them and see what happens. And your dyno just proved that your stock ls3 IS as fast at a mildly modded 5.0
How does a poor sole with a child brain such as yours even hold a job that pays enough to buy a 35k car.
You said stock ls3 vs mild coyote. An e85 tune is not stock. Your 1/4 mile time is damn close to what a joe in a mild 5.0 would run. You weren't trying to show what e85 can do, you came onto a mustang forum to brag about how a lighter more aerodynamic car with more displacement is faster than a car that a lot of people on said forum drive...
This is the dumbest post I've seen in a while..
"And your dyno just proved that your stock ls3 IS as fast at a mildly modded 5.0"
You just raced dyno numbers.. And then you compared a vette which is hundreds of pounds lighter, better gearing and aerodynamics to a 5.0 with a tune lol.. Sorry but go and run a 415rwhp C6 LS3 and go and view some tail lights, since you know EVERYTHING about racing.. Your entire post is just full of fail!
This is the dumbest post I've seen in a while..
"And your dyno just proved that your stock ls3 IS as fast at a mildly modded 5.0"
You just raced dyno numbers.. And then you compared a vette which is hundreds of pounds lighter, better gearing and aerodynamics to a 5.0 with a tune lol.. Sorry but go and run a 415rwhp C6 LS3 and go and view some tail lights, since you know EVERYTHING about racing.. Your entire post is just full of fail!
And thank you for pointing out this. Hes clueless. I didnt come here to flame or get flamed, but I wanted to show what E85 did for me. Also I have owned (2) 2011 Mustang GTs so I know exactly what they can do.
I was talking stock. Now its not stock with just an E85 tune. Its going to be decimation now. The 1/4 mile time was on the stock tires with a 2.2 sixty and granny shifting. My trap if I compare it to similar # cars should be 118+mph.
Tell that to every asshat with a 5.0 that wants to race me at every light on every street ever. The fun never stops now that they all think their stock or mildly modified 5.0s are as fast as a stock LS3 vette. NOPE.
Oh and the car bone stock before the tune ran 12.4@115 repeatable 1/4 runs and also ran 145mph trap at the chicago half mile.
I meant to say his 1/4 time. See the post after.
Youre an idiot.
Ok well that's different.. But really with a 2.2 60ft you know there is a lot left in it.. He stated 40roll and mentioned a little bit of the 1/4mi time which in my eyes is screwed because of the sixty.. Doing a 40pull is a totally different story though.
Once again someone understands. And again thank you.
I mean my car went 11.0@131 with 600rwhp lol.. Oh but the 60ft was a 2.1 lol.. You guys really think my car is a 131 mph car and a 11.0 car??? alllrriigghhtt lol..
Now I wouldn't go and recommend lining up a against a e85 5.0 with slicks and skinnys at the dragstrip and expecting to rape him.. But you seem smarter than that.