Good catch... you are correct. Except base price is 54,095, both destination charge $900 and GG Tax are listed in the options that are added to the base price. It's also 1,300 for manual and 2,600 for auto.
Now I've learned something...:coolman:
zl1 vs gt500 dyno same day.
- Thread starter javierrflores
- Start date
Good catch... you are correct. Except base price is 54,095, both destination charge $900 and GG Tax are listed in the options that are added to the base price. It's also 1,300 for manual and 2,600 for auto.
Now I've learned something...:coolman:
thats what i thought in the first place....GG tax sucks...GM fail
it should be for twice the price.
Just like the Ford GT should've been greater than the C6 ZO6, but we certainly know that wasn't the case and it was more than twice the price.
Last edited:
Yeah... sorry man...
Liberal Tax makers suck too... and it still ends up being a tax on tax.
so says the 4th gen. catfish owner with a heads/cam/headers/intake/tune/bolt on car that still can't compete with either car in stock configuration. :lol1:
LOL, oh no the dreaded catfish joke again. You got me there man. Buahahaha and you're right I can't compete with either car in stock trim and I honestly don't care.
:lol:
STFU please. FGT is supercar teritory, more to it than speed. Not that it isn't actually as fast or faster than C6Z anyway. There were plenty of supercars slightly slower than the Z when it came out, that doesn't make them inferior vehicles.
The case here is, ZL1 is clearly the inferior vehicle in every department measurable pretty much.
What does your car run?
Sure thing buddy
By the way what other testing was done between the 2 to show the ZL1 was inferior in every department?
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
