Van@RevanRacing
Active Member
I'm not saying AFCO is better or worse, they are not the ones claiming to be better though. What I'm saying that people seem to be blind about is that if they were tested and his came out on top, he'd have pretty much the entire market..... Taking a corner on a entire market IMO would be something I'd want if it was my product.
First and foremost regardless of whether or not I tested both units back to back on the same day and produced the data then my integrity would be called into question. "You can't possibly be the one to do the testing as it would be biased" I can't argue that point.
But hey, what's a few grand, fuel, track time, car wear, tire wear, engine wear, labor, parts, materials.................to prove I have a better product. These threads are numerous and they can provide copious amounts of reading time fi that's what you want. Just start the search back in 2008.
I've already mentioned one example of a vendor asking me to test their product after they already said it was superior and they hadn't even tested it.
I appreciate your position that I could "corner the market" on heat exchangers but have you noticed the silence from the other manufacturers. Perhaps one comment that we use "such and such core". Nope.
Now the shoe is being placed on my foot to provide the testing! LOL My wife gives me enough to do on my honey do list and I don't need any more added to it! LOL Nobody else will provide data so I should do it? I suppose and then it would be called B.S. Slippery Slope. Hopefully you can see and understand my position.